Social Media

      An interesting statement made by Raquel Recuero in the You Tube video, Digital Youth, Social Movements, and Democracy in Brazil (2012), in regards to social media was that social media is not creating the problem; social media is showing the problem .  When considering the problems associated with social media such as bullying, lack of privacy and the sharing of too much information, I realized the truth of the statement made by Recuero.  These issues always existed in society.  There was always bullying, there was always a threat to the young when sharing too much personal information with strangers.  It’s this very reason that parents warn their small children not to talk to strangers.  Social media just emphasized problems that always existed in our society. 

    Weblogs and the Public Sphere and Digital Youth, Social Movement, and Democracy in Brazil both discussed the use of blogs in effecting change within society.  The problem identified is that while everyone has access to blogs, not everyone is able to be heard.  The larger blogs with the time and money are so big that interaction and collaboration is limited.  It’s mainly one person sharing their opinion and controlling what stories circulate through the system (O’Baroill, p. 5).   

     One of the benefits of social media mentioned by Recuero is the ability to impact change in social movements and critical thinking.  Social media when used effectively draw attention to social movements.  Recuero mentioned the attention that social media brought to a polluted river.  Citizens banned together and had the river cleaned.  There are cultural benefits to social media.  The problem is the inability of smaller blogs to reach the right people in order to make these types of changes.  Weblogs and the Public Sphere refers to it as the “propagation network that serves to privilege some over others” (p. 5). 

     While social media can have a positive impact on society, it remains a bit one sided, with the haves still controlling the have-nots.  I am concerned about the possibility of the loss of network neutrality as discussed in Networked Publics.  Without network neutrality, those with the means and time will be able to impose their views on the many.  Opposing views will be lost and unable to be heard. 

References

O'Baoill, A. (n.d.). Weblogs and the Public Sphere. Retrieved from Into the Blogshere: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/weblogs_and_the_public_sphere.html

Recuero, Raquel. Digital Youth, Social Movements and Democracy in Brazil. N.p.: Connected Learning TV, 24 July 2012. YouTube.

Varnelis, K. (. (2012). Networked Publics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Simultaneous Place

     The topic that interested me most from Networked Publics was Simultaneous Place:  Networked Publics.  Simultaneous Place:  Networked Publics suggests that even with the benefits of technology (conversations via cell phones, surfing the Internet on laptops, listening to music on iPhones, texting, reading books or newspapers from electronic sources, we still gather to somehow enjoy the companionship of others even in our solitude.  We have managed to exist in simultaneous places…the world of technology and a physical location. With so many ways to stay connected, why gather in a common place and not physically communicate with those most proximate to us?  The gathering is not by chance. It is an innate need developed in the eighteenth century. We had a desire to gather in cafes and salons to have critical debates about the latest newsletter or pamphlet (Varnelis, 2012, p. 16). It is not the physical place that is important, but the discourse that occurs.  Those gathering in the physical location (Starbucks in this example) are seeking meaningful discussions, critiques and analysis utilizing non-place such as laptops and cellular telephones. It is not necessary to assemble, but we desire the interaction even without the spoken word.

      Anthropologist Marc Ange suggests that our sense of place will end (Varnelis, 2012, p. 18).  He believes that we will exist in a non-place such as spaces of transitions absent of identity, human relationships or traces of humans (airports, airplanes, garages), data (in front of the computer), goods and capital (the space in front of the ATM, mall or supermarket)as solitary individuals (Varnelis, 2012, p. 18).  We will lose who we are in this non-place…our identities, language, and rules will be lost.  Ange believes that we will jeopardize our cultural approach to literacy according to Green’s three dimensions of Literacy and Technology. We will lose our ability to transfer languages and rules to future generations.  We will lose who we are and forget how we came to be who we are. We will forget why we do the things we do.  We will forget why the things we do are the right things.  The critical approach to literacy allows us to make meaning and participate in society.  Without the knowledge of the culture, we cannot hope to be an active participating member of society; one capable of effecting appropriate changes when necessary.

     I believe that regardless of the technological advancements, we will continue to seek interaction.  Our identities are formed through these interactions.  We will still gather in the smoke areas, at the water cooler and near the coffee maker.  We will find ways to fulfill this need.  A recent company initiative to include photographs of all employees on the company telephone directory proves this point.  As soon as the photographs became available on line, employees were searching for individuals that they have had contact with via email.  There was a desire to put a face with the name.  I believe that we will always have that desire to associate with others.  That is the reason we gather in crowds at Starbucks to just text, surf the Internet or listen to music on their iPhones. 

Reference

Varnelis, K.(Ed.).(2008). Networked Publics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.